³Ô¹Ïtv

• In the fall semester, a committee is appointed by the chancellor to review nominations for the awards in the following spring semester and recommend, confidentially, to the chancellor up to three full-time, exempt or non-exempt staff members (at least one exempt and at least one non-exempt) that will be chosen based on supplied justification in the nominations.
• The committee will include eight (8) members, approved by the chancellor:
  • (3) The most recent award recipients
  • (2) Two representatives of the Staff Council
  • (2) Two at-large members, from within the above groups, previous recipients, or a member of the previous year’s committee.
  • (1) One representative from HR.
• The chancellor appoints the committee chairperson.

• The committee follows procedures and criteria as outlined in this document. However, if no candidates are judged to meet the criteria in a particular category, the committee will not recommend a recipient in that category.
• All proceedings of this committee must be kept strictly confidential.
• The chancellor will review the recommendations of the committee and select and announce the award recipients at an appropriate time.

The following procedures are recommended for receiving and reviewing nominations:

• The chancellor’s office solicits nominations in the spring semester via a campus-wide email.
• Nominators complete a submission form. The form addresses specific criteria and invites the nominator to write their rationale for nomination. The nomination must address the criteria and not exceed one written page.
• Once the nomination deadline has passed, the chancellor’s office will collect all nominations and continue with the nomination vetting process.
• The names of the nominees will be submitted by the chancellor’s office confidentially to Human Resources, who will then notify the chancellor’s office of any pending or relevant adverse personnel action(s), solicit a job description, and confirm that the nominees have a minimum of three years’ employment with ³Ô¹Ïtv.
• Once the HR information has been secured, the chancellor’s office will then notify each nominee’s supervisor and solicit a one-page letter of support from the supervisor, specifically addressing the selection criteria.
• The committee will review each nomination according to the selected criteria and recommend recipients, in a confidential manner, to the chancellor.
• The chancellor will review and approve the recommended recipients, personally notify the recipients, and make an announcement at an appropriate time.

• Cari Edwards, clerical
• David Rainbolt, professional/technical
• John Brendle, service/maintenance

• Teresa Andrews, clerical
• Karen Richie, professional/technical
• Anita Harris, service/maintenance

• Tammy Glover, clerical
• Dana Gohmann, professional/technical
• Joe Lampkin, service/maintenance

• Christy Thomas, clerical
• Danny Clements, professional/technical
• All Facility Operations staff, service/maintenance

• Michelle Clements, clerical
• Joe Glover, professional/technical
• Danny Wilson, service/maintenance

• Mary Ann Wild, clerical
• Kirk Randolph, professional/technical
• Beth Hogan, service/maintenance

• Mary Patterson, clerical
• Julie Ingram, professional/technical
• Lesa Dean, service/maintenance

• Kim Shaughnessy, clerical
• Michael Turley, professional/technical
• Bettie Ricketts, service/maintenance

• Amanda Dailey-Weaver, clerical
• Kim Pelle, professional/technical
• Sean Engleman, service/maintenance

• Christine Thompson, clerical
• Melissa D. Hill, professional/technical
• James M. Curd, service/maintenance